Beneficial Ownership returns. The greatest stuff up we’ve ever dealt with.
It just gets worse and worse.
Trusts
Here’s the latest stuff up, an email from the Master:
- The staff member concerned is the one tasked with submitting all our clients’ Beneficial Ownership returns.
- She has NO authority to disclose the contents of the return. The Master, however, is giving her that power.
- We have two Growth Trusts on our books and there are another two on the portal, and the email does not give the trust number.
Companies
Here’s the old news:
- When completing the submission you have to select “Company without Beneficial Owners” or “Company with Beneficial Owners”
- The Beneficial Owners of a company are defined as including the shareholder(s).
- So what is a company without Beneficial ownership?
- The Act says that a Beneficial ownership must be submitted for all companies.
- Thereafter a new one must be submitted annually or within 10 days of a change of Beneficial Owner.
- I have previously held that CIPC is wrong to require that a Beneficial Ownership return must be submitted annually.
- However s33(1)(aA) and (aB) of the Companies Act as amended now requires this. So I was wrong.
Here’s the latest from CIPC:
- All newly registered companies must submit their first return within 10 days of registration. This is consistent with the new Act that says that a new Beneficial Ownership return must be submitted within 10 days of any change.
- But here’s some of the information that has to be submitted regarding each Beneficial Owner:
- Demographic (i.e Black, White, Asiatic, Coloured).
- Gender.
- Disability.
- What the heck have any of these got to do with anti money laundering or financing of terrorism?
2 comments
Reply
So what is a company without Beneficial ownership?
1. NPC without members (technically the directors are the BO but CIPC already knows about them so afaik you can go ahead with a non beneficial owners submission)
2. All shareholders < 5%.
The trick is that the question is "without beneficial owners to declare" which gets shortened in the description, thereby making it wrong.
Hi Carl,
I agree. It’s a stuff up.
In their guide, they specifically include NPCs. The founders have the power to appoint the directors so, presumably, they are beneficial owners even if not shareholders. But they can receive no benefits (neither can shareholders), so there’s a strong argument for NPCs not having any beneficial owners.
The other error they made is to require an annual BO return, which is not in accordance with the Act.
And then they want to know whether you’re Black, White, Asian or Coloured, disabled, male or female. What the heck has that got to do with anything?